drug dealer: use prepaid phones

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.64
, client
Weight: 0.63
, criminal
Weight: 0.62
, person
Weight: 0.62
Siblings drug
Weight: 0.59
, drug addict
Weight: 0.37
, drug use
Weight: 0.36
, pharmacist
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
use prepaid phones 1.00
use phones 0.87
have phones 0.86
use old phones 0.83
have two phones 0.83
have old phones 0.81
carry two phones 0.81
have multiple phones 0.80
have cell phones 0.80
use flip phones 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, use flip phones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, use flip phones)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(drug dealer, use flip phones)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(drug dealer, use flip phones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have multiple phones)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(drug dealer, carry two phones)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(drug dealer, use old phones)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have two phones)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have multiple phones)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have multiple phones)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have multiple phones)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(drug dealer, have old phones)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, have old phones)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, use prepaid phones)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(drug dealer, use prepaid phones) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(drug dealer, use prepaid phones)