dry ice: be useful for smoke effect

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings water vapor
Weight: 0.35
, cold water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.34
, ice cube
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful for smoke effect 1.00
produce smoke effect 0.93
give off smoke 0.84
is useful 0.76
is harmful 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(dry ice, produce smoke effect)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(dry ice, produce smoke effect)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dry ice, produce smoke effect)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(dry ice, give off smoke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(dry ice, give off smoke)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(dry ice, give off smoke)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, give off smoke)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dry ice, is useful)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dry ice, is useful)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dry ice, is useful)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, produce smoke effect)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)