dry ice: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents chemical
Weight: 0.61
, material
Weight: 0.60
, method
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.57
, product
Weight: 0.56
Siblings water vapor
Weight: 0.35
, cold water
Weight: 0.35
, salt water
Weight: 0.34
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.34
, ice cube
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful for smoke effect 0.76
is dangerous good 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dry ice, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(method, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(method, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(method, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(dry ice, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(dry ice, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, be useful for smoke effect)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Salient(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(dry ice, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(dry ice, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(method, is useful)