duck: has physical part wings

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fowl
Weight: 0.66
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, dish
Weight: 0.60
Siblings goldeneye
Weight: 0.64
, mallard
Weight: 0.60
, coot
Weight: 0.58
, snow goose
Weight: 0.56

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part wings 1.00
twitch wings 0.82
has physical part beaks 0.80
has physical part feet 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duck, has physical part wings)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duck, has physical part wings)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mallard, has physical part feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(coot, has physical part feet)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(mallard, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(duck, has physical part wings)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(duck, has physical part wings)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(mallard, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(mallard, has physical part beaks)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(mallard, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(mallard, has physical part feet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(coot, has physical part feet) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(coot, has physical part feet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(duck, has physical part wings)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(duck, has physical part feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(duck, has physical part feet)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(duck, has physical part feet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part feet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Salient(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(duck, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mallard, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(mallard, has physical part feet)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(coot, has physical part feet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(duck, has physical part wings) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)