eagle: have sharp claws

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.67
, predator
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden eagle
Weight: 0.89
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp claws 1.00
have sharp beaks 0.89
have sharp keen eyes 0.81
has physical part beaks 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp claws)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(golden eagle, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(eagle, have sharp claws)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp claws)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(eagle, have sharp claws) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)