eagle: has physical part beaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.67
, predator
Weight: 0.64
, wildlife
Weight: 0.58
, symbol
Weight: 0.58
Siblings golden eagle
Weight: 0.89
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.37
, owl
Weight: 0.36
, heron
Weight: 0.36
, blue bird
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part beaks 1.00
have sharp beaks 0.91
have hooked beaks 0.87
has physical part wings 0.80
has physical part eyes 0.79
have sharp claws 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(bird, has physical part wings)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(predator, has physical part eyes)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(bird, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(bird, has physical part wings)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(predator, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(heron, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(owl, has physical part eyes)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(owl, has physical part eyes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part wings)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(eagle, has physical part wings)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part wings)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have hooked beaks)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part wings)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(eagle, has physical part eyes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(eagle, has physical part eyes)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part eyes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(eagle, have sharp claws)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(eagle, have sharp beaks)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(eagle, have sharp claws)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(eagle, have sharp claws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(eagle, have sharp claws)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(eagle, have hooked beaks)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(eagle, have hooked beaks)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(eagle, have hooked beaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Plausible(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(golden eagle, has physical part beaks)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(heron, has physical part beaks)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(owl, has physical part eyes)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(predator, has physical part eyes)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part beaks)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(eagle, has physical part beaks)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(bird, has physical part wings)