ecology: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to science 0.82
be linked 0.78
be related to other disciplines 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.16
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be linked)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(biology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biology, be related)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(meteorology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(agriculture, be linked) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be linked)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ecology, be related)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(ecology, be linked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ecology, be linked)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Plausible(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(agriculture, be linked)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(biology, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(ecology, be related) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)