ecology: be related to other disciplines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to other disciplines 1.00
be related to disciplines 0.99
be different from other areas 0.80
affect other areas of science 0.79
be different from other areas of biology 0.79
be related to science 0.78
be related 0.77
be different from areas 0.77
affect other areas 0.77
be different from areas of biology 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(science, be related)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(science, be related)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(science, be related)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(biology, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(biology, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(meteorology, be related)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(meteorology, be related)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(ecology, be different from areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from other areas of biology)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from areas)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(ecology, be different from areas)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be different from areas of biology)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(ecology, be related)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ecology, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(biology, be related)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(meteorology, be related)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(science, be related)