ecology: be related to disciplines

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents science
Weight: 0.65
, project
Weight: 0.60
, issue
Weight: 0.60
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings biology
Weight: 0.36
, computer science
Weight: 0.36
, meteorology
Weight: 0.35
, biodiversity
Weight: 0.34
, agriculture
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related to disciplines 1.00
be related to other disciplines 0.99
be related to science 0.76
affect other areas of science 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(science, be related to science)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(biology, be related to science)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(science, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(biology, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(biology, be related to science)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(agriculture, be related to science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(agriculture, be related to science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(ecology, be related to science)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to other disciplines)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ecology, be related to science)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(ecology, affect other areas of science)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to science)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(biology, be related to science)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(agriculture, be related to science)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(ecology, be related to disciplines) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(science, be related to science)