email: be bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad 1.00
be good 0.87
has quality bad 0.86
is ungiven good 0.86
is horrible 0.83
is good thing 0.79
is ugly 0.77
be good for business 0.77
has quality good 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(web site, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(web site, is horrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(gift, is ungiven good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(web site, is horrible)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(gift, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(web site, is ugly)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(web site, is horrible)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(gift, is ungiven good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(web site, is ugly)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gift, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(complaint, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be good for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(thunderbird, has quality bad)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(gift, is ungiven good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(email, be bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(web site, is ugly) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(email, be bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(web site, is horrible) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(email, be bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(gift, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(email, be bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(complaint, be good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(complaint, is good thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, is good thing)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(thunderbird, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(thunderbird, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(complaint, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(complaint, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(complaint, be good for business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(complaint, be good for business)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(email, be bad)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(email, has quality good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(email, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(email, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(email, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(email, be bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(web site, is horrible)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(web site, is ugly)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(complaint, is good thing)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(complaint, be good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(complaint, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(complaint, be good for business)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(gift, is ungiven good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(web site, is horrible)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(gift, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(email, be bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(web site, is ugly)