email: be helpful in communication

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
be helpful in communication 1.00
be good form of communication 0.89
be important in business communication 0.89
be most important means of communication 0.87
be important tool in communications 0.84
be important tool in modern communications 0.82
be effective way communicating 0.82
be good for communicating 0.81
be useful 0.81
is useful 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(letter, be important in business communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(letter, be most important means of communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(letter, be important in business communication)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(letter, be important in business communication)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(letter, be good form of communication)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(letter, be most important means of communication)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(letter, be important in business communication)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(letter, be good form of communication)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(letter, be most important means of communication)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(email, be helpful in communication)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(email, be important tool in modern communications)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(email, be effective way communicating)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(email, be important tool in modern communications)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(email, be effective way communicating)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(email, be effective way communicating)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(email, be effective way communicating)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(email, be important tool in modern communications)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(email, be important tool in modern communications)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(email, is useful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(email, is useful)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(email, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.63
Salient(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(letter, be important in business communication)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(letter, be good form of communication)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(letter, be most important means of communication)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(letter, be important in business communication)