email: is useful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents page
Weight: 0.63
, letter
Weight: 0.62
, web site
Weight: 0.61
, gift
Weight: 0.61
Siblings junk mail
Weight: 0.65
, complaint
Weight: 0.60
, reminder
Weight: 0.57
, id
Weight: 0.56
, thunderbird
Weight: 0.53

Related properties

Property Similarity
is useful 1.00
be useful 0.99
be helpful in communication 0.80
be useful among students 0.79
be important to organisation 0.79
be important 394 0.79
be useful to historians 0.78
be on essential 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(page, be important 394)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(email, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(letter, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(email, is useful)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(letter, be useful to historians)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(page, be important 394)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(letter, be useful to historians)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(page, be important 394)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(page, be important 394)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(email, is useful)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(letter, be useful to historians)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(email, is useful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(complaint, be important to organisation)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(complaint, be important to organisation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(email, is useful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(email, be helpful in communication)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(email, be useful among students)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(email, be useful among students)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(email, be helpful in communication)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(email, be helpful in communication)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(email, be helpful in communication)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(email, be useful among students)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(email, be useful among students)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(email, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(letter, be useful to historians)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(page, be important 394)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(complaint, be important to organisation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(letter, be useful to historians)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.66
Typical(email, is useful)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(page, be important 394)