employee: wants to get raise

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents other person
Weight: 0.69
, creditor
Weight: 0.64
, driver
Weight: 0.64
, officer
Weight: 0.63
Siblings office worker
Weight: 0.74
, construction worker
Weight: 0.74
, salesperson
Weight: 0.70
, receptionist
Weight: 0.69
, waiter
Weight: 0.69

Related properties

Property Similarity
wants to get raise 1.00
wants to raise 0.98
ask for raise 0.92
raise build 0.92
wants to more money 0.77
make up lose time 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, raise build)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(construction worker, raise build)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(construction worker, raise build)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(employee, wants to get raise)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to raise)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(employee, wants to raise)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to raise)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(employee, ask for raise)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(employee, ask for raise)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(employee, ask for raise)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(employee, wants to raise)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, make up lose time)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(employee, ask for raise)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to more money)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(employee, make up lose time)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(employee, wants to more money)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(employee, make up lose time)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to more money)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(employee, wants to more money)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(employee, make up lose time)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(employee, wants to get raise)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to get raise)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(construction worker, raise build)