engineer: need understand

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents scientist
Weight: 0.70
, expert
Weight: 0.65
, contractor
Weight: 0.65
, construction worker
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.65
Siblings physicist
Weight: 0.57
, james watt
Weight: 0.54
, geologist
Weight: 0.37
, architect
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
need understand 1.00
need know 0.91
need learn 0.86
do 0.83
need have 0.83
need work 0.80
need keep 0.79
prefer think 0.79
need worry 0.78
need able 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(contractor, do)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(employee, need understand)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(contractor, do)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.09
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(employee, need understand)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(architect, do)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(architect, need know)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(employee, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(engineer, need understand)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(contractor, do)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(engineer, need understand)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(engineer, need understand)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(architect, need know)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(architect, need know)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(architect, do)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(architect, do)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(engineer, need understand)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(engineer, need understand)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(architect, do)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(architect, need know)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(employee, need understand)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(contractor, do)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(engineer, need understand)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)