england: was important to britain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new england
Weight: 0.68
, europe
Weight: 0.68
, italy
Weight: 0.64
, new zealand
Weight: 0.63
, world
Weight: 0.61
Siblings spain
Weight: 0.38
, france
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.37
, sweden
Weight: 0.36
, britain
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to britain 1.00
was britain 0.98
was called britain 0.96
was britain called 0.96
was important to great britain 0.96
be called britain 0.96
was great britain 0.95
was great britain called 0.94
was called great britain 0.94
be called great britain 0.93

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(britain, be called great britain)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(britain, be called britain)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(england, was important to britain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(england, was important to britain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(britain, be called britain)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(britain, be called britain)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(britain, be called great britain)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(britain, be called great britain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Salient(england, was important to britain)

Similarity expansion

0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(england, was britain)
0.83
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(england, was britain)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(england, was called britain)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(england, was britain)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(england, was called britain)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(england, be called britain)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(england, be called britain)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(england, was called britain)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(england, be called great britain)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(england, be called britain)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(england, be called great britain)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(england, be called great britain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(england, was called britain)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(england, be called britain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(england, was britain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(england, be called great britain)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 1.00
Salient(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(britain, be called britain)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(britain, be called great britain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)