new england: was important to great britain

Related concepts

Parents	new york Weight: 0.74 , country Weight: 0.65 , north america Weight: 0.65 , england Weight: 0.60
Siblings	new hampshire Weight: 0.75 , new york city Weight: 0.73 , vermont Weight: 0.68 , new orleans Weight: 0.68 , maine Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property	Similarity
was important to great britain	1.00
was important to britain	0.96
was most difficult region for england control	0.78
be called new england	0.77
be called england	0.77
is new england	0.76
is england	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(england, was important to britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(england, be called new england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

0.27

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(england, be called england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Plausible(england, was important to britain)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(england, be called england)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(england, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(england, be called new england)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(england, be called england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(maine, be called england)

0.02

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.96

Plausible(england, was important to britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(england, be called new england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(england, be called england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called england)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(maine, be called england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(maine, be called england)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(maine, be called new england) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(new england, was important to great britain)

Similarity expansion

0.78

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Salient(new england, was important to britain)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Plausible(new england, was important to britain)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(new england, is new england)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(new england, be called england)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(new england, is england)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Salient(new england, be called england)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(new england, be called england)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(new england, be called new england)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(new england, is new england)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(new england, is new england)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Plausible(new england, is england)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Salient(new england, is england)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.83

¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Remarkable(new england, be called england)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(new england, is new england)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(new england, is england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.94

Salient(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.80

Plausible(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(england, be called england)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(england, be called new england)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.00

¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.04

¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called england)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(maine, be called england)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(england, be called england)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.78

Typical(new england, was important to great britain) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(england, be called new england)