new england: was important to britain

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new york
Weight: 0.74
, country
Weight: 0.65
, north america
Weight: 0.65
, england
Weight: 0.60
Siblings new hampshire
Weight: 0.75
, new york city
Weight: 0.73
, vermont
Weight: 0.68
, new orleans
Weight: 0.68
, maine
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
was important to britain 1.00
was important to great britain 0.96
be called england 0.78
is england 0.77
be called new england 0.77
was most difficult region for england control 0.76
is new england 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(england, be called england)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(england, was important to britain)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(england, be called new england)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(england, was important to britain)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(england, be called new england)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(england, be called england)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(maine, be called england)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(england, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(england, be called england)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to britain)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called england)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(maine, be called england)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(maine, be called england)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 1.00
Remarkable(new hampshire, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(maine, be called new england)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(maine, be called new england)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(new england, was important to britain)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to great britain)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is england)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(new england, was important to great britain)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, be called new england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(new england, be called england)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new england, is new england)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(new england, be called england)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(new england, be called england)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is england)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(new england, is new england)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new england, be called new england)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called england)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(new england, is england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(new england, be called new england)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(new england, is new england)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(new england, is england)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, be called new england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(new england, is new england)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(new england, was important to great britain)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(new england, was important to great britain)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new england, was most difficult region for england control)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(new england, was most difficult region for england control)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(new england, was important to britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called new england)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(new hampshire, be called england)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(maine, be called england)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(maine, be called new england)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(england, be called england)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(england, was important to britain)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(new england, was important to britain)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(england, be called new england)