equilibrium: be considered dynamic process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movie
Weight: 0.52
Siblings harmony
Weight: 0.32
, elasticity
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.31
, cohesion
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered dynamic process 1.00
is dynamic process 0.97
be considered dynamic 0.93
be considered process 0.90
is dynamic 0.88
is dynamic state 0.87
be said dynamic in system 0.87
be dynamic in nature 0.86
be said dynamic 0.85
has physical part process 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered process)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered process)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(equilibrium, has physical part process)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, has physical part process)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, has physical part process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(equilibrium, has physical part process)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)