equilibrium: be said dynamic in system

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents term
Weight: 0.57
, concept
Weight: 0.55
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, movie
Weight: 0.52
Siblings harmony
Weight: 0.32
, elasticity
Weight: 0.32
, singularity
Weight: 0.31
, cohesion
Weight: 0.31
, duality
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be said dynamic in system 1.00
be said dynamic 0.96
be said dynamic in closed system 0.94
is dynamic state 0.88
is dynamic process 0.87
is dynamic 0.87
be considered dynamic process 0.87
be considered dynamic 0.86
be dynamic in nature 0.83
be important in dynamics 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be dynamic in nature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in closed system)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be important in dynamics)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic process)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be considered dynamic)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(equilibrium, is dynamic state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, is dynamic process)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(equilibrium, is dynamic state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(equilibrium, be said dynamic in system)