ethics: be important in psychology

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.57
, journal
Weight: 0.57
, course
Weight: 0.54
, committee
Weight: 0.53
, book
Weight: 0.50
Siblings commission
Weight: 0.32
, theology
Weight: 0.32
, science fiction
Weight: 0.32
, political ideology
Weight: 0.31
, senate
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in psychology 1.00
matter in sociology 0.83
be related to economics 0.78
is situational theology 0.76
is science 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(theology, is science)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(theology, is situational theology)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(theology, is situational theology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(theology, is situational theology)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(theology, is science) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(theology, is science)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(ethics, be important in psychology)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(ethics, matter in sociology)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(ethics, matter in sociology)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(ethics, be related to economics)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ethics, is science)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(ethics, matter in sociology)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(ethics, is science)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ethics, is science)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ethics, be related to economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(ethics, be related to economics)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(ethics, is science)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be related to economics)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ethics, matter in sociology)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(ethics, be important in psychology)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(theology, is situational theology)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(ethics, be important in psychology) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(theology, is science)