exchange: be important in marketing

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents transfer
Weight: 0.66
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, issue
Weight: 0.61
, third party
Weight: 0.60
Siblings conversation
Weight: 0.62
, dialogue
Weight: 0.60
, option
Weight: 0.60
, stock market
Weight: 0.33
, bank statement
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in marketing 1.00
be important to marketing 1.00
be important in business 0.80
be important for development meritnation 0.78
be important for development 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exchange, be important in marketing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exchange, be important in marketing)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exchange, be important in marketing)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(issue, be important in business)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development meritnation)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important for development)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(issue, be important in business)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(conversation, be important in business)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(issue, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development meritnation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(issue, be important for development) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(conversation, be important in business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(conversation, be important in business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(exchange, be important in marketing)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important to marketing)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(exchange, be important to marketing)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(exchange, be important to marketing)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(exchange, be important to marketing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(exchange, be important in marketing)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(conversation, be important in business)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(issue, be important in business)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(exchange, be important in marketing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(issue, be important for development meritnation)