exhalation: has physical part process

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents story
Weight: 0.39
, force
Weight: 0.39
, source
Weight: 0.36
, inhalation
Weight: 0.32
, valve
Weight: 0.31
Siblings atmospheric pressure
Weight: 0.28
, gravitation
Weight: 0.27
, delta force
Weight: 0.27
, torque
Weight: 0.27
, light source
Weight: 0.27

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part process 1.00
is passive process 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(inhalation, is passive process)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.45
Plausible(inhalation, is passive process)
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(exhalation, has physical part process)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(exhalation, is passive process)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, is passive process)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(exhalation, is passive process)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(exhalation, is passive process)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Salient(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(inhalation, has physical part process)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(exhalation, has physical part process)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(inhalation, is passive process)