expansion: be related

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be related 1.00
be related to number 0.86
be related to area 0.85
be related to numbers 0.81
be related use examples 0.78
be related to prime number 0.78
be in property plant related to range 0.77
be in property plant related to range expected 0.77
be in property plant related expected 0.77
be in property plant related 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(factor, be related)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to number)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to area)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to prime number)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to numbers)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to number)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related to area)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(factor, be related use examples)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(factor, be related)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(factor, be related to area)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(factor, be related to prime number)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(factor, be related to number)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(factor, be related to numbers)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(factor, be related use examples)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(expansion, be related)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(expansion, be related)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(expansion, be related)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related to prime number)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(factor, be related)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(factor, be related to number)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(factor, be related to area)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(factor, be related to numbers)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(factor, be related use examples)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Typical(expansion, be related)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(factor, be related to prime number)