expansion: need have

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents project
Weight: 0.69
, construction
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, growth
Weight: 0.59
, issue
Weight: 0.58
Siblings construction site
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.34
, restoration
Weight: 0.33
, revision
Weight: 0.33
, consolidation
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
need have 1.00
need work 0.90
is needed 0.85
need work together 0.81
need planning 0.78
need managed 0.76
is necessary 0.76
be important in things 0.76
seem take longer 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(project, need have)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(project, seem take longer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(project, need managed)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(growth, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(project, need have)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(factor, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(growth, is necessary)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(project, need managed)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(project, need planning)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(project, seem take longer)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(project, seem take longer)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, need have)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(project, need managed)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(project, need planning)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(factor, is necessary)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(growth, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(revision, is needed)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(consolidation, is necessary)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(restoration, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(project, need have)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(project, need planning)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(project, seem take longer)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(project, need managed)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(growth, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(factor, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(expansion, need have)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(construction worker, need work)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(revision, is needed)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(revision, is needed)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(construction worker, need work together)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(construction worker, need work together)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(restoration, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(restoration, is necessary)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.95
Remarkable(consolidation, is necessary)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(consolidation, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(expansion, need have)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(expansion, need have)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(project, need have)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(growth, is necessary)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(project, need managed)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, seem take longer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(revision, is needed)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(construction worker, need work together)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(restoration, is necessary)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(consolidation, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(project, need have)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(growth, is necessary)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(factor, is necessary)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(project, need managed)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(project, need planning)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(expansion, need have)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(project, seem take longer)