expert: tell lot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents psychologist
Weight: 0.71
, technology
Weight: 0.59
, physician
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.56
Siblings analyst
Weight: 0.76
, author
Weight: 0.74
, scholar
Weight: 0.73
, lawyer
Weight: 0.69
, scientist
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
tell lot 1.00
teach what they know 0.85
answer lot of question 0.81
explain difference to us 0.79
note that something bad happen 0.79
be pay to know about law 0.76
discover new thing 0.76
has good understand of specific topic 0.76
be great 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(technology, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(technology, be great)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(technology, be great)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, note that something bad happen)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(scientist, discover new thing)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(technology, be great) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(expert, tell lot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(lawyer, note that something bad happen) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(lawyer, note that something bad happen)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(scientist, discover new thing) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(scientist, discover new thing)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Salient implies Plausible

0.16
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(expert, tell lot)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(expert, answer lot of question)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, teach what they know)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(expert, explain difference to us)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(expert, teach what they know)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(expert, teach what they know)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(expert, explain difference to us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(expert, explain difference to us)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(expert, explain difference to us)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(expert, answer lot of question)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(expert, teach what they know)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(expert, answer lot of question)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(expert, has good understand of specific topic)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(expert, answer lot of question)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(technology, be great)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(scientist, discover new thing)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(lawyer, note that something bad happen)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Typical(expert, tell lot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(technology, be great)