lawyer: be pay to know about law

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents activist
Weight: 0.71
, expert
Weight: 0.69
, specialist
Weight: 0.66
, defendant
Weight: 0.66
Siblings investigator
Weight: 0.65
, solicitor
Weight: 0.58
, arbitrator
Weight: 0.54
, fisher
Weight: 0.54
, judge
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be pay to know about law 1.00
decide law 0.85
teach what they know 0.82
need law degree 0.80
be pay for consult 0.77
tell lot 0.76
rule over case 0.76
be used to sue person 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expert, teach what they know)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(expert, tell lot)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(expert, teach what they know)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(expert, tell lot)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(expert, teach what they know)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(judge, decide law)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(judge, rule over case)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(expert, teach what they know)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(expert, tell lot)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(judge, decide law)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(judge, decide law)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(judge, rule over case)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(judge, rule over case)

Salient implies Plausible

0.13
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, need law degree)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(lawyer, need law degree)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be used to sue person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be pay for consult)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(lawyer, be used to sue person)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay for consult)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(lawyer, be pay for consult)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(lawyer, need law degree)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay for consult)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(lawyer, be used to sue person)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(lawyer, be used to sue person)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(lawyer, need law degree)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, teach what they know)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(judge, decide law)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(judge, rule over case)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(expert, teach what they know)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(lawyer, be pay to know about law)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(expert, tell lot)