fast food restaurant: be used to get fat

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.80
, junk food
Weight: 0.70
, food
Weight: 0.69
, place
Weight: 0.65
, location
Weight: 0.65
Siblings fast food
Weight: 0.85
, pizza
Weight: 0.68
, hamburger
Weight: 0.66
, subway
Weight: 0.59
, diner
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to get fat 1.00
be fatty 0.83
use duck fat to saute vegetable 0.78
be used to get something to eat 0.78
be used to eat 0.77
be used to eat at 0.77
be used to eat to get food 0.77
be used to eat out 0.77
be used to eat in 0.76
has many calorie but few vitamin 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(restaurant, be used to eat at)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be fatty)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(diner, be used to get something to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(diner, be used to eat in)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat at) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(restaurant, be used to eat in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(place, be used to eat to get food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(diner, be used to get something to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(diner, be used to get something to eat)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(fast food, be fatty) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fast food, be fatty)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(diner, be used to eat in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(diner, be used to eat in)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fast food, be used to eat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fast food, be used to eat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat out)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to eat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Salient(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(fast food, be used to eat)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(diner, be used to eat in)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fast food, be fatty)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(diner, be used to get something to eat)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fast food, has many calorie but few vitamin)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat at)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(restaurant, be used to eat in)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(place, be used to eat to get food)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(fast food restaurant, be used to get fat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(restaurant, use duck fat to saute vegetable)