fedora: have bad reputation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents hat
Weight: 0.68
, operating system
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.52
, distribution
Weight: 0.51
Siblings sombrero
Weight: 0.32
, sweater
Weight: 0.32
, cape
Weight: 0.32
, wig
Weight: 0.32
, robe
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
have bad reputation 1.00
have reputation 0.97
have suddenly bad reputation 0.95
have bad reputation on internet 0.93
have suddenly reputation 0.92
have reputation on internet 0.89
has quality bad 0.81
has quality good 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(hat, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(operating system, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality bad)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(operating system, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(hat, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(sweater, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(wig, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(hat, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(operating system, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(hat, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(wig, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(wig, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(sweater, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(sweater, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fedora, have bad reputation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(fedora, have reputation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(fedora, have bad reputation on internet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation on internet)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fedora, have suddenly reputation)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation on internet)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(fedora, have bad reputation)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hat, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(wig, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(sweater, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(hat, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(hat, has quality good)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(fedora, have bad reputation) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(operating system, has quality good)