ficus: be at canada

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tree
Weight: 0.72
, plant
Weight: 0.61
, shrub
Weight: 0.46
, variety
Weight: 0.37
, member
Weight: 0.28
Siblings oak tree
Weight: 0.38
, cherry tree
Weight: 0.38
, apple tree
Weight: 0.38
, maple tree
Weight: 0.38
, christmas tree
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at canada 1.00
be at australia 0.87
be find in malaysia 0.81
be at new mexico 0.79
be at america 0.79
be at spain 0.77
be at illinois 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tree, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ficus, be at canada)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tree, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(tree, be at australia)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at spain)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at america)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.20
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(tree, be at australia)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(apple tree, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at canada)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(apple tree, be at new mexico)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(apple tree, be at america)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at america)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(apple tree, be at illinois)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(apple tree, be at spain)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(apple tree, be at spain)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(ficus, be at canada)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(ficus, be at illinois)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ficus, be at illinois)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at illinois)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(ficus, be at illinois)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(ficus, be at canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at australia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at new mexico)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at america)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at canada)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at illinois)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(apple tree, be at spain)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(ficus, be at canada)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(tree, be at australia)