fighting: has quality wrong

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, problem
Weight: 0.59
, action
Weight: 0.58
, issue
Weight: 0.57
Siblings battle
Weight: 0.35
, fighter
Weight: 0.33
, living thing
Weight: 0.33
, guerrilla warfare
Weight: 0.32
, playing game
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality wrong 1.00
has quality bad 0.87
has quality good 0.85
be wrong school 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fighting, has quality wrong)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crime, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.46
Plausible(crime, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(fighting, has quality wrong)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(fighting, has quality wrong)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(fighting, be wrong school)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality good)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality bad)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(fighting, has quality good)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(fighting, be wrong school)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(fighting, has quality wrong)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(fighting, has quality wrong)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, has quality bad)