filling: be with beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.56
, recipe
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, function
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lemon curd
Weight: 0.57
, mousse
Weight: 0.57
, fill
Weight: 0.35
, lining
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with beneficial 1.00
be with up beneficial 0.96
be with nitrogen beneficial 0.82
be with up nitrogen beneficial 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with beneficial)