filling: be with nitrogen beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.56
, recipe
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, function
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lemon curd
Weight: 0.57
, mousse
Weight: 0.57
, fill
Weight: 0.35
, lining
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with nitrogen beneficial 1.00
be with up nitrogen beneficial 0.98
be with beneficial 0.82
be with up beneficial 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with beneficial)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(filling, be with beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with beneficial)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with up beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)