filling: be with up beneficial

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents service
Weight: 0.56
, recipe
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
, function
Weight: 0.51
, method
Weight: 0.48
Siblings lemon curd
Weight: 0.57
, mousse
Weight: 0.57
, fill
Weight: 0.35
, lining
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be with up beneficial 1.00
be with beneficial 0.96
be with up nitrogen beneficial 0.84
be with nitrogen beneficial 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with up beneficial)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with beneficial)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(filling, be with beneficial)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with beneficial)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(filling, be with beneficial)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(filling, be with up nitrogen beneficial)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(filling, be with nitrogen beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(filling, be with up beneficial)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(filling, be with up beneficial) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(filling, be with up beneficial)