fire: be dangerous to human

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.81
, explosion
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fire department
Weight: 0.85
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.84
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.73
, sprinkler
Weight: 0.60
, lightning
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to human 1.00
be dangerous 0.91
be dangerous and destructive 0.88
be very dangerous 0.87
be very dangerous even deadly 0.86
be beautiful but dangerous 0.84
be hot to human 0.81
be defined as one very dangerous activity 0.80
be very destructive and can kill person 0.80
be destructive to biological body 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(explosion, be dangerous)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(violence, be dangerous)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(explosion, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(explosion, be dangerous)