fire: be dangerous and destructive

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fire extinguisher
Weight: 0.81
, explosion
Weight: 0.62
, violence
Weight: 0.62
, cause
Weight: 0.61
Siblings fire department
Weight: 0.85
, fire alarm
Weight: 0.84
, smoke alarm
Weight: 0.73
, sprinkler
Weight: 0.60
, lightning
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous and destructive 1.00
be destructive 0.96
be dangerous 0.91
be very destructive and can kill person 0.88
be dangerous to human 0.88
be very dangerous even deadly 0.87
be very dangerous 0.86
be destructive to biological body 0.83
be beautiful but dangerous 0.83
be defined as one very dangerous activity 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(explosion, be dangerous)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(violence, be dangerous)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(explosion, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(violence, be dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(lightning, be destructive)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(lightning, be destructive)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(lightning, be very dangerous)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous to human)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fire, be very destructive and can kill person)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(fire, be dangerous to human)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be dangerous)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(explosion, be dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(lightning, be very dangerous even deadly)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(lightning, be destructive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(lightning, be very dangerous)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(lightning, be beautiful but dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(violence, be dangerous)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(violence, be defined as one very dangerous activity)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(fire, be dangerous and destructive)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(explosion, be dangerous)