firefighter: has tough job

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.65
, fire department
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.63
Siblings fireman
Weight: 0.38
, arsonist
Weight: 0.37
, police officer
Weight: 0.35
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has tough job 1.00
has dangerous job 0.84
wants to have fun on job 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(firefighter, has tough job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(firefighter, has tough job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.11
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(firefighter, has tough job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(firefighter, has tough job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(firefighter, has tough job) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)