fireman: has dangerous job

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
Siblings firefighter
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, plumber
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has dangerous job 1.00
has tough job 0.84
wants to have fun on job 0.83
leave their job 0.79
strike job 0.76
has very dangerous occupation 0.76
rush job 0.76
labor at job 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(worker, labor at job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(worker, leave their job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(worker, strike job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(worker, strike job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(worker, leave their job)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Plausible(worker, labor at job)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(worker, leave their job)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(worker, strike job)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(worker, labor at job)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(plumber, rush job)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, has very dangerous occupation)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(employee, wants to have fun on job)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(worker, leave their job)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.97
Plausible(worker, labor at job)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(worker, strike job)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(firefighter, has tough job)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(firefighter, has tough job)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(construction worker, has very dangerous occupation)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(construction worker, has very dangerous occupation)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(plumber, rush job)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(plumber, rush job)

Salient implies Plausible

0.10
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(fireman, has dangerous job)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(worker, labor at job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(worker, leave their job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, strike job)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(construction worker, has very dangerous occupation)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(firefighter, has tough job)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(plumber, rush job)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(worker, labor at job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(worker, leave their job)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(employee, wants to have fun on job)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(fireman, has dangerous job)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(worker, strike job)