fireman: wear badges

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents employee
Weight: 0.65
, job
Weight: 0.64
, public servant
Weight: 0.64
, worker
Weight: 0.63
Siblings firefighter
Weight: 0.38
, policeman
Weight: 0.35
, construction worker
Weight: 0.35
, office worker
Weight: 0.34
, plumber
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
wear badges 1.00
wear uniforms 0.84
wear hats 0.82
wear red 0.80
wear yellow 0.79
wear brass helmets 0.78
wear backwards hats 0.76
wear brown 0.76
wear red suspenders 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireman, wear badges)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(employee, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(employee, wear uniforms)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear hats)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear red suspenders)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(employee, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear badges)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(policeman, wear uniforms) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(policeman, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(policeman, wear hats)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(construction worker, wear hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear hats)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(firefighter, wear yellow) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(construction worker, wear backwards hats) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(firefighter, wear red suspenders) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(firefighter, wear red suspenders)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(fireman, wear badges)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(fireman, wear uniforms)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fireman, wear hats)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(fireman, wear uniforms)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear uniforms)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fireman, wear red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(fireman, wear yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear yellow)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear hats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(fireman, wear brass helmets)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(fireman, wear backwards hats)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear red suspenders)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(fireman, wear brown)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear hats)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear uniforms)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear brass helmets)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(fireman, wear red suspenders)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(fireman, wear hats)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear backwards hats)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear brown)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear yellow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear backwards hats)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fireman, wear red)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(fireman, wear yellow)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear brass helmets)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear brown)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(fireman, wear backwards hats)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(fireman, wear brass helmets)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fireman, wear brown)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(fireman, wear red suspenders)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(fireman, wear red suspenders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(fireman, wear badges)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(policeman, wear uniforms)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear backwards hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(construction worker, wear hats)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(policeman, wear hats)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(firefighter, wear yellow)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(firefighter, wear red suspenders)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(fireman, wear badges) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(employee, wear uniforms)