firm: need money

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents law firm
Weight: 0.81
, financial institution
Weight: 0.61
, institution
Weight: 0.58
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings software company
Weight: 0.70
, ubs
Weight: 0.64
, vanguard
Weight: 0.58
, boeing
Weight: 0.57
, renault
Weight: 0.57

Related properties

Property Similarity
need money 1.00
get money 0.93
make money 0.91
spend money 0.85
need funding 0.81
need resources 0.81
borrow money 0.81
spend money on costly innovation 0.79
spend money on innovation 0.79
want maximise 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(software company, make money)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(software company, make money)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(software company, make money)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(firm, need money)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(firm, need resources)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(firm, spend money)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(firm, need resources)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(firm, spend money)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(firm, need resources)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(firm, spend money)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(firm, spend money on costly innovation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(firm, need funding)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(firm, need funding)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Salient(firm, need funding)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(firm, need resources)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(firm, need funding)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(firm, spend money on costly innovation)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(firm, spend money on costly innovation)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Typical(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(firm, spend money on costly innovation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Salient(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(firm, need money)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(firm, need money)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(firm, need money)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(software company, make money)