fitness: relate to selection

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents factor
Weight: 0.60
, magazine
Weight: 0.59
, field
Weight: 0.59
, subject
Weight: 0.58
, goal
Weight: 0.58
Siblings air conditioning
Weight: 0.34
, training
Weight: 0.33
, nutrition
Weight: 0.33
, football field
Weight: 0.32
, motivation
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
relate to selection 1.00
relate to natural selection 0.94
be related selection 0.92
relate to color 0.80
be measured in theory of selection 0.78
be measured in theory of natural selection 0.78
relate to evolution 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to selection)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be related selection)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to color)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to evolution)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to natural selection)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to evolution)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to color)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to evolution)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to evolution)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(fitness, relate to color)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fitness, relate to color)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of natural selection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(fitness, be related selection)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(fitness, be measured in theory of selection)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(fitness, be related selection)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(fitness, be related selection)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(fitness, relate to selection)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(fitness, relate to selection)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(fitness, relate to selection)