flavor: be important in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, factor
Weight: 0.61
, trait
Weight: 0.59
, attribute
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.59
Siblings petal
Weight: 0.52
, texture
Weight: 0.36
, taste
Weight: 0.36
, ingredient
Weight: 0.34
, hair color
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in food 1.00
be in food 0.94
spread through food 0.78
spread through refrigerated food 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(texture, be important in food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(taste, be in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(taste, be in food)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(texture, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(texture, be important in food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(flavor, be important in food)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(flavor, be in food)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(flavor, be in food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(flavor, spread through food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(flavor, be in food)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be in food)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(flavor, spread through food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(flavor, spread through food)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(flavor, spread through food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be in food)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(texture, be important in food)