taste: be in food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents quality
Weight: 0.69
, trait
Weight: 0.66
, sensation
Weight: 0.65
, characteristic
Weight: 0.61
, factor
Weight: 0.61
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, smell
Weight: 0.34
, texture
Weight: 0.34
, passion
Weight: 0.33
, friendliness
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in food 1.00
is food 0.98
be important in food 0.94
affect taste of food 0.85
spread through food 0.81
affect tastiness of food 0.80
spread through refrigerated food 0.80
change enjoyment of foods 0.76
change enjoyment of certain foods 0.76
be in drinks 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(texture, be important in food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be in food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(flavor, spread through food)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of foods)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(flavor, be in food)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(flavor, be in food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(flavor, be important in food)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(flavor, spread through food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(flavor, spread through food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(smell, affect taste of food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(smell, affect taste of food)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(texture, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(texture, be important in food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(taste, be in food)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(taste, is food)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(taste, is food)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taste, is food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(taste, is food)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(taste, be in drinks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(taste, be in drinks)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(taste, be in drinks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in drinks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Salient(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Plausible(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(taste, be in food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(flavor, be in food)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(flavor, spread through food)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(flavor, spread through refrigerated food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(smell, affect taste of food)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(texture, be important in food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(taste, be in food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)