texture: affect tastiness of food

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, aspect
Weight: 0.64
, feature
Weight: 0.64
, factor
Weight: 0.59
, element
Weight: 0.59
Siblings flavor
Weight: 0.36
, hair color
Weight: 0.36
, hardness
Weight: 0.35
, color
Weight: 0.35
, palette
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
affect tastiness of food 1.00
affect tastiness 0.98
change enjoyment of foods 0.80
affect taste 0.79
change enjoyment of certain foods 0.79
be important in food 0.78
affect much taste 0.77
be important to taste 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(flavor, be important in food)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(flavor, be important in food)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(texture, affect tastiness)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(texture, affect taste)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(texture, affect tastiness)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(texture, affect much taste)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(texture, affect taste)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(texture, affect much taste)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(texture, affect taste)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(texture, affect tastiness)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(texture, be important in food)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(texture, change enjoyment of certain foods)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(texture, change enjoyment of foods)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(texture, affect much taste)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(texture, be important to taste)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect taste)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(texture, be important in food)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect much taste)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(texture, be important in food)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(texture, be important to taste)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(texture, be important in food)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(texture, be important to taste)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(texture, be important to taste)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Salient(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(texture, affect tastiness of food)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(texture, affect tastiness of food)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(flavor, be important in food)