flirting: has quality jokes

Related concepts

Parents	sexual harassment Weight: 0.54 , behavior Weight: 0.51 , thing Weight: 0.50 , film Weight: 0.44 , relationship Weight: 0.37
Siblings	talking Weight: 0.32 , sexual assault Weight: 0.32 , kissing Weight: 0.32 , laughing Weight: 0.31 , drunk driving Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality jokes	1.00
has quality bad	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality jokes)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality jokes)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(relationship, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality jokes)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(relationship, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(relationship, has quality bad)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(behavior, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(kissing, has quality bad)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Remarkable(talking, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(behavior, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.32

Plausible(sexual harassment, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.18

Plausible(relationship, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

Remarkable(laughing, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(laughing, has quality bad)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

Remarkable(kissing, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(kissing, has quality bad)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

Remarkable(talking, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(talking, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Salient(flirting, has quality jokes)

Similarity expansion

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality bad)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(flirting, has quality bad)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Plausible(flirting, has quality bad)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.70

Salient(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.44

Plausible(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(flirting, has quality jokes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(relationship, has quality bad)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(laughing, has quality bad)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(kissing, has quality bad)

0.03

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Remarkable(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Typical(talking, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Typical(relationship, has quality bad)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Typical(sexual harassment, has quality bad)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.24

Typical(flirting, has quality jokes) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(behavior, has quality bad)