foam: is bad insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.99
is insulator 0.98
make good insulator 0.97
is better insulator 0.97
make insulator 0.97
is best insulator 0.96
be used as insulator 0.96
is good heat insulator 0.95
is good sound insulator 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(foam, is bad insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(foam, is insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is best insulator)