foam: is good insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
is good insulator 1.00
is bad insulator 0.99
make good insulator 0.99
is better insulator 0.98
is insulator 0.98
is best insulator 0.98
make insulator 0.97
be used as insulator 0.96
is good sound insulator 0.96
is good heat insulator 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulator)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(foam, is insulator)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(foam, is bad insulator)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Typical(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(foam, is bad insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.89
Salient(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(fiberglass, be used as insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is best insulator)