styrofoam: is better insulator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.62
, foam
Weight: 0.58
, item
Weight: 0.58
, container
Weight: 0.54
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cardboard
Weight: 0.35
, plastic wrap
Weight: 0.35
, plastic
Weight: 0.34
, cardboard box
Weight: 0.34
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is better insulator 1.00
is good insulator 0.98
is insulator 0.97
is best insulator 0.97
make good insulator 0.97
make insulator 0.97
is good heat insulator 0.95
be good insulator of heat 0.95
be good insulator for heat 0.95
is good sound insulator 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(foam, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulator)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is good insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(cardboard, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(foam, is good sound insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(foam, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(plastic, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(cardboard, is insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(plastic, is good insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(cardboard, is good insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(cardboard, is good insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(styrofoam, make insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good sound insulator)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(cardboard, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(plastic, is insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(cardboard, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(plastic, is good insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good heat insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(plastic wrap, is good insulator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(foam, is good sound insulator)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)