foam: be good insulator of heat

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents feature
Weight: 0.56
, composition
Weight: 0.56
, material
Weight: 0.55
, surface
Weight: 0.55
, filler
Weight: 0.52
Siblings latex
Weight: 0.60
, styrofoam
Weight: 0.58
, adhesive tape
Weight: 0.34
, silicone
Weight: 0.33
, fiberglass
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good insulator of heat 1.00
is good heat insulator 1.00
be good insulator for heat 1.00
is heat insulator 0.99
is good insulator 0.96
make good insulator 0.95
is bad insulator 0.95
is better insulator 0.95
is insulator 0.94
is best insulator 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(styrofoam, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(styrofoam, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(fiberglass, is insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(fiberglass, is heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good heat insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(fiberglass, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(styrofoam, is good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(styrofoam, is better insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(styrofoam, make good insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(styrofoam, is best insulator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(styrofoam, is best insulator)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(foam, is insulator)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(foam, is good insulator)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(foam, is bad insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(foam, is insulator)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(foam, is insulator)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(foam, is insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Salient(foam, is good insulator)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(foam, is bad insulator)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(foam, is bad insulator)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(foam, is good insulator)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(foam, is bad insulator)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.50
Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(foam, is good insulator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Plausible(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(foam, be good insulator of heat)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is heat insulator)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is heat insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is insulator)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is better insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator of heat)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good heat insulator)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(styrofoam, make good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(fiberglass, is good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is good insulator)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(styrofoam, be good insulator for heat)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(foam, be good insulator of heat) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(styrofoam, is best insulator)