food chain: is necessary

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents concept
Weight: 0.62
, chain
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, topic
Weight: 0.59
Siblings taco bell
Weight: 0.70
, restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.66
, mcdonald
Weight: 0.65
, supermarket
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is necessary 1.00
have necessary 0.97
be necessary for survival of animals 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(topic, is necessary)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(concept, is necessary)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.07
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(concept, is necessary)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(topic, is necessary)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(concept, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food chain, is necessary)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(topic, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(food chain, is necessary)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(food chain, is necessary)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(food chain, have necessary)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(food chain, have necessary)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(food chain, have necessary)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(food chain, have necessary)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(food chain, be necessary for survival of animals)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.57
Salient(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(food chain, is necessary)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(topic, is necessary)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(food chain, is necessary) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(concept, is necessary)