ford: be better than chevys

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents manufacturer
Weight: 0.59
, car
Weight: 0.59
, corporation
Weight: 0.56
, name
Weight: 0.55
Siblings volvo
Weight: 0.61
, mustang
Weight: 0.54
, mercedes benz
Weight: 0.34
, porsche
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be better than holdens 1.00
be better than chevys 1.00
has quality better 0.86
be cheaper than chevys 0.84
is more expensive 0.78
be better than chevy 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevys)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(ford, be better than holdens)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(ford, be better than holdens)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than holdens)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than holdens)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(ford, has quality better)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(ford, has quality better)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(ford, is more expensive)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(ford, is more expensive)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ford, be better than chevy)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(ford, has quality better)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(ford, be cheaper than chevys)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(ford, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ford, be better than chevy)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevy)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(ford, is more expensive)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(ford, is more expensive)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Salient(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ford, be better than chevys)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(ford, be better than chevys) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ford, be better than chevys)